<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking arguments against the Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/</link>
	<description>ramblings of a philomathic polymath</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:48:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>You missed the previous paragraph about the Army&#039;s Mach 5 cluster that clocks the 2.0GHz G5 at 4.8 Gigaflops per CPU. You&#039;re comparing the wrong numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the previous paragraph about the Army&#8217;s Mach 5 cluster that clocks the 2.0GHz G5 at 4.8 Gigaflops per CPU. You&#8217;re comparing the wrong numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/10/03/debunking-arguments-against-the-mac/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;the cluster built last year at Virginia Tech using 1,100 Mac desktops has a theoretical peak of about 18.2 Teraflops and initially benchmarked at 8.1 Teraflops to deliver a contribution of &lt;b&gt;3.7 Gigaflops per CPU.

...

&quot;Lightning,&quot; at Los Alamos National Laboratory Latest News about Los Alamos National Laboratory, uses 2,816 Opterons to produce a peak of 11,264 or &lt;b&gt;4.0 Gigaflops per CPU &lt;/b&gt;-- 30 percent better than the Xeons, but &lt;i&gt;still 20 percent less than the G5s.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&gt;


So let me get this straight.  Windows PC&#039;s are slower than Macs because 4.0 is &quot;20 percent less than&quot; 3.7.  Take it to the bank, baby.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="the cluster built last year at Virginia Tech using 1,100 Mac desktops has a theoretical peak of about 18.2 Teraflops and initially benchmarked at 8.1 Teraflops to deliver a contribution of <b><p>3.7 Gigaflops per CPU.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Lightning,&#8221; at Los Alamos National Laboratory Latest News about Los Alamos National Laboratory, uses 2,816 Opterons to produce a peak of 11,264 or <b>4.0 Gigaflops per CPU </b>&#8211; 30 percent better than the Xeons, but <i>still 20 percent less than the G5s.</i>&#8220;></p>
<p>So let me get this straight.  Windows PC&#8217;s are slower than Macs because 4.0 is &#8220;20 percent less than&#8221; 3.7.  Take it to the bank, baby.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.216 seconds -->
