<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 36 weeks&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2005/05/31/36-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2005/05/31/36-weeks/</link>
	<description>ramblings of a philomathic polymath</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2005/05/31/36-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=84#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Again, off topic, but...


STEVE JOBS, WWDC 2005:

10:26am PDT - â€œNow, letâ€™s go to the big topic: Transitions.â€

10:27am PDT - 1994-1996 Moto 68K -&gt; PowerPC. â€œI wasnâ€™t hear then, but from everything I hear the team did a great job.â€ 2001-2003: OS9 - OS X.

10:28am PDT - â€œItâ€™s time for a third transition. And yes, (puts up slide that says): Itâ€™s true.â€ Next slide is one word: â€œWhy?â€

10:29am PDT - â€œI stood up two years ago and promised this (3.0G PowerMac), and we havenâ€™t been able to deliver.â€ Steve says itâ€™s bigger than that, though. No roadmap for the future based on PowerPC - they canâ€™t see a future.

10:30am PDT - Intel offers not just increased performance, but reduced power consumption. Transition will be complete by WWDC â€˜07.

10:31am PDT - PowerPC - 15 integer perf units (not sure what) per watt. Intel does 70 per watt. â€œMac OS X has been living a secret double lifeâ€ for the past 5 years.

10:32am PDT - Satellite shot with crosshairs shows building where a team has been working on the â€œJust in Caseâ€¦â€ scenario. Every release of Mac OS X has been compiled for Intel for the past 5 years.


IT&#039;S TRUE.

-Bryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, off topic, but&#8230;</p>
<p>STEVE JOBS, WWDC 2005:</p>
<p>10:26am PDT &#8211; â€œNow, letâ€™s go to the big topic: Transitions.â€</p>
<p>10:27am PDT &#8211; 1994-1996 Moto 68K -&gt; PowerPC. â€œI wasnâ€™t hear then, but from everything I hear the team did a great job.â€ 2001-2003: OS9 &#8211; OS X.</p>
<p>10:28am PDT &#8211; â€œItâ€™s time for a third transition. And yes, (puts up slide that says): Itâ€™s true.â€ Next slide is one word: â€œWhy?â€</p>
<p>10:29am PDT &#8211; â€œI stood up two years ago and promised this (3.0G PowerMac), and we havenâ€™t been able to deliver.â€ Steve says itâ€™s bigger than that, though. No roadmap for the future based on PowerPC &#8211; they canâ€™t see a future.</p>
<p>10:30am PDT &#8211; Intel offers not just increased performance, but reduced power consumption. Transition will be complete by WWDC â€˜07.</p>
<p>10:31am PDT &#8211; PowerPC &#8211; 15 integer perf units (not sure what) per watt. Intel does 70 per watt. â€œMac OS X has been living a secret double lifeâ€ for the past 5 years.</p>
<p>10:32am PDT &#8211; Satellite shot with crosshairs shows building where a team has been working on the â€œJust in Caseâ€¦â€ scenario. Every release of Mac OS X has been compiled for Intel for the past 5 years.</p>
<p>IT&#8217;S TRUE.</p>
<p>-Bryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2005/05/31/36-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=84#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>James-

Completely unrelated, but...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Apple+to+ditch+IBM%2C+switch+to+Intel+chips/2100-1006_3-5731398.html?tag=nefd.lede&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WOW.&lt;/a&gt;

Next they&#039;ll be telling me that Ford is going to start using Chevy engines.

-Bryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James-</p>
<p>Completely unrelated, but&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.com.com/Apple+to+ditch+IBM%2C+switch+to+Intel+chips/2100-1006_3-5731398.html?tag=nefd.lede" rel="nofollow">WOW.</a></p>
<p>Next they&#8217;ll be telling me that Ford is going to start using Chevy engines.</p>
<p>-Bryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.130 seconds -->

