<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 Thoughts Followup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/</link>
	<description>ramblings of a philomathic polymath</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwigdahl</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-18329</link>
		<dc:creator>jwigdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18329</guid>
		<description>If you have evidence of it truly being a rights case, please submit it. A vague reference to laws (that may well be from Djibouti) will not stand as case here. Until I see something to the contrary, California Family Code section 297.5 carries my claim:

&quot;Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits [snip] as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.&quot;

What law is not going to be viewed by someone as limiting the rights of the minority?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have evidence of it truly being a rights case, please submit it. A vague reference to laws (that may well be from Djibouti) will not stand as case here. Until I see something to the contrary, California Family Code section 297.5 carries my claim:</p>
<p>&#8220;Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits [snip] as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.&#8221;</p>
<p>What law is not going to be viewed by someone as limiting the rights of the minority?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-18326</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18326</guid>
		<description>why its a rights issue... 
if we define civil unions as being between same-sex couples ... as heterosexual couples have the right to choose marriage... and yes there are actually laws that give rights/protections to married couples including the ability to transfer assets and not claiming them as gifts between married couples... so yes i still think the pro proposition 8 may be the majority ... but its another case of the majority limiting the rights of a minority...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why its a rights issue&#8230;<br />
if we define civil unions as being between same-sex couples &#8230; as heterosexual couples have the right to choose marriage&#8230; and yes there are actually laws that give rights/protections to married couples including the ability to transfer assets and not claiming them as gifts between married couples&#8230; so yes i still think the pro proposition 8 may be the majority &#8230; but its another case of the majority limiting the rights of a minority&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.128 seconds -->

