Comments for wigblog http://thinkmuch.com/blog ramblings of a philomathic polymath Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:12:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Apache (httpd) 403 errors & SELinux in FC3 by Dave http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/comment-page-1/#comment-27127 Dave Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:12:17 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/#comment-27127 This isn't working for me... I have a clean install of Fedora 15 with virtual hosts configured. Everything is working just fine when SELinux is set to permissive but as soon as I enable it, I get "Forbidden - You don't have permission to access / on this server" but only on the virtual host located under my home folder (the standard /var/www/html works fine). I have tried what you suggested but still get the same problem... "ls -Z" for the htdocs folder yields: drwxr-xr-x. administrator administrator system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 htdocs Any help would be very much appreciated as I am pulling my hair out on this one... This machine is Internet facing and I really don't want to disable SELinux if I can avoid it. Thanks... This isn’t working for me… I have a clean install of Fedora 15 with virtual hosts configured. Everything is working just fine when SELinux is set to permissive but as soon as I enable it, I get “Forbidden – You don’t have permission to access / on this server” but only on the virtual host located under my home folder (the standard /var/www/html works fine).

I have tried what you suggested but still get the same problem… “ls -Z” for the htdocs folder yields:

drwxr-xr-x. administrator administrator system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 htdocs

Any help would be very much appreciated as I am pulling my hair out on this one… This machine is Internet facing and I really don’t want to disable SELinux if I can avoid it.

Thanks…

]]> Comment on Apache (httpd) 403 errors & SELinux in FC3 by Kevin http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/comment-page-1/#comment-22976 Kevin Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:48:59 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/#comment-22976 Thanks!!!!! I have been working on this for a long time and I finally got it to work!!! Thanks!!!!! I have been working on this for a long time and I finally got it to work!!!

]]> Comment on Apache (httpd) 403 errors & SELinux in FC3 by Nanaji http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/comment-page-1/#comment-22965 Nanaji Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:57:37 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/#comment-22965 really , Thanks a millions you guys are great! really , Thanks a millions

you guys are great!

]]> Comment on Prop 8 Thoughts by jwigdahl http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/11/prop-8-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-20739 jwigdahl Sun, 31 May 2009 03:55:12 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=159#comment-20739 @kathy A - Please see my <a href="/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/" rel="nofollow">followup post</a> for refutation of the "rights" issue. As for being a "constitutional right"... I'd probably ask them for clarification and to produce the text which shows this (it doesn't exist). @kathy A – Please see my followup post for refutation of the “rights” issue. As for being a “constitutional right”… I’d probably ask them for clarification and to produce the text which shows this (it doesn’t exist).

]]> Comment on Prop 8 Thoughts by kathy A http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/11/prop-8-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-20735 kathy A Sun, 31 May 2009 02:41:32 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=159#comment-20735 Your comments are very astute and very valid. Thanks for putting it all together. One question: How would you defend against those who believe this to be a "constitutional right"? Your comments are very astute and very valid. Thanks for putting it all together. One question:
How would you defend against those who believe this to be a “constitutional right”?

]]> Comment on Apache (httpd) 403 errors & SELinux in FC3 by the real DuWayne http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/comment-page-1/#comment-18981 the real DuWayne Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:16:50 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2004/11/17/apache-httpd-403-errors-selinux-in-fc3/#comment-18981 Thanks a million! Thanks a million!

]]> Comment on Jess & Noah on TV! by Chris http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2009/02/03/jess-noah-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-18910 Chris Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:49:45 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=164#comment-18910 Great job, Jess! You & Noah are TV naturals :) See you soon!! Great job, Jess! You & Noah are TV naturals :) See you soon!!

]]> Comment on Prop 8 Thoughts Followup by jwigdahl http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-18329 jwigdahl Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:20:07 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18329 If you have evidence of it truly being a rights case, please submit it. A vague reference to laws (that may well be from Djibouti) will not stand as case here. Until I see something to the contrary, California Family Code section 297.5 carries my claim: "Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits [snip] as are granted to and imposed upon spouses." What law is not going to be viewed by someone as limiting the rights of the minority? If you have evidence of it truly being a rights case, please submit it. A vague reference to laws (that may well be from Djibouti) will not stand as case here. Until I see something to the contrary, California Family Code section 297.5 carries my claim:

“Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits [snip] as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.”

What law is not going to be viewed by someone as limiting the rights of the minority?

]]> Comment on Prop 8 Thoughts Followup by zach http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/18/prop-8-thoughts-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-18326 zach Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:45:36 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18326 why its a rights issue... if we define civil unions as being between same-sex couples ... as heterosexual couples have the right to choose marriage... and yes there are actually laws that give rights/protections to married couples including the ability to transfer assets and not claiming them as gifts between married couples... so yes i still think the pro proposition 8 may be the majority ... but its another case of the majority limiting the rights of a minority... why its a rights issue…
if we define civil unions as being between same-sex couples … as heterosexual couples have the right to choose marriage… and yes there are actually laws that give rights/protections to married couples including the ability to transfer assets and not claiming them as gifts between married couples… so yes i still think the pro proposition 8 may be the majority … but its another case of the majority limiting the rights of a minority…

]]> Comment on Prop 8 Thoughts by Carolynn http://thinkmuch.com/blog/archives/2008/10/11/prop-8-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-18257 Carolynn Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:38:01 +0000 http://thinkmuch.com/blog/?p=159#comment-18257 James, Thanks for this!! You've done a great job of laying this all out. It's amazing how confusing this stuff can be when so many false claims are made. I appreciate your perspective on this. Carolynn James,
Thanks for this!! You’ve done a great job of laying this all out. It’s amazing how confusing this stuff can be when so many false claims are made. I appreciate your perspective on this.
Carolynn

]]>